Editorial Policy

Our standard

We aim to make nutrition and fitness information understandable without overstating certainty. Articles should distinguish established evidence, practical interpretation, and product guidance.

Sources and review

Writers should prefer primary research, systematic reviews, and guidance from recognized public-health or professional organizations. Sources are listed on each article. Content that could materially affect health decisions should be reviewed by a suitably qualified professional before being labeled medically or dietetically reviewed.

Until a named qualified reviewer is shown on an article, readers should not interpret the organizational byline as professional medical review.

Updates and corrections

A modified or reviewed date is changed only after substantive review. Material corrections should be made promptly and reflected in the visible article and structured data.

Independence and limitations

Articles may explain kkal.ai features, but comparisons and recommendations should state selection criteria and avoid unsupported superlatives. Nutrition estimates are not diagnoses or individualized treatment.